![]() ![]() Squashing means: create a new commit that includes all changes and apply it on top of the destination branch. This brings us to the other method of applying your pull-request changes to the destination repository: squashing. Remove space, Fix unit-test, Fix test again, Almost giving up, Aaargh etc.). More than often, the message of those separate commits are quickly chosen and meaningless to coworkers (f.e. In most cases, these separate commits don't have any added value and will only pollute the source control history. Merging the pull-request leaves the separate commits that were needed for a certain pull-request visible in the repository and you'll clearly see a merge to the destination branch. With git (and thus BitBucket), there are two ways to do this. Once the pull-request has been approved by the Continuous Integration system and one or more coworkers, you can apply your changes to the destination repository. If code needs to be refactored before you can add the new feature, consider if you can do the refactor first, in a separate pull-requestĪs one last note on code reviews: adding one or more unit-tests should be mandatory and also increases the confidence coworkers will have in your change.Create a separate pull-request for the reformatting alone or write down an issue and do it later ![]() Don't reformat a complete file/directory when fixing a bug or adding a feature.Commit messages and linked issues should clearly describe why the change is needed.įor the same reason, always keep the changes as small as possible: The time of your coworker is precious, so don't botter them with code style issues, formatting issues and changes that are unrelated to the feature or issue you're trying to resolve. Even when the team only consists of two people, code reviewing can be benefiting.Īlso here, when using BitBucket, you can disallow merging of a pull-request before a certain number of coworkers have approved your change. In a team working on the same code-base, code-quality and knowledge sharing can be improved by introducing code reviews. This can be configured in the settings of a repository. When using BitBucket f.e., you can disallow merging of a pull-request if it doesn't pass Continuous Integration. Creating a pull-request is putting your code up for review by other coworkers but also to trigger our Continuous Integration system and see if our changes won't break anything (see Continuous Integration topic above). This allows us to detect breaking changes early in the process before actually breaking the code-base for everyone. Any change to one of those branches should be requested by the means of a pull-request. When working in team on a serious project, nobody should ever directly commit to a develop or master branch. This depends on user or team preference, but know that Sourcetree groups branches in some kind of tree-structure when they use the / as separator in their name, which can be convenient. The master branch is where we merge in tested release branches or hotfix branches (bugfixes/patches).įor release and hotfix branch names, some guides will use hotfix- and release- as prefix, while others will use hotfix/ and release/ as prefix. The develop branch is where we merge in or squash in finished feature branches. In gitflow, you'll always have a develop and a master branch. GitKraken is another example that also runs on Linux but is not free of charge. Sourcetree from Atlassian is a great, free UI tool for Mac and Windows that supports git and gitflow. Many UI tools are available that simplify the process of working with git and gitflow. A successful Git branching model by Vincent Driessen.A lot has been written about this subject in commercial and non-commercial posts, so let's just point to a few interesting articles:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |